Lots of tweets about carbs and dee
65 stories
·
1 follower

DNC Rips Mike Pence for Lying, Failing to Mention LGBTQ People in World AIDS Day Speech for Second Year in a Row

1 Share

Vice President Mike Pence, who said in 2000 that he was in favor of sending money allocated to care for people with HIV/AIDS to organizations that provide gay conversion therapy, failed to mention the LGBTQ community in his World AIDS Day speech for the second year in a row.

The Democratic National Committee blasted Pence in an email, listing some of the lies he told, and some of the truths he forgot to mention:

THE LIES HE TOLD

Pence boasted about the success of the Ryan White HIV/AIDS program, despite the fact the Trump administration diverted funds from the program to offset the costs of its family separation policy.

Pence celebrated the 15th anniversary of PEPFAR, calling it “one of the most successful investments in health care and humanitarian aid in American history,” while Trump’s budget proposal slashed the initiative’s funding.

Pence claimed Trump brought a “renewed energy and focus” to the battle against HIV/AIDS.

I mean, come on. [see below]

THE TRUTHS HE FORGOT TO MENTION

Trump fired the remaining members of the Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS after several members quit because Trump “doesn’t care” about the issue.

Trump still hasn’t appointed anyone to lead the White House Office of National AIDS Policy.

Trump announced the “Deploy or Get Out” rule, which could remove HIV+ military personnel from service.

Pence, while governor of Indiana, opposed a needle exchange program and exacerbated the local HIV/AIDS crisis.

The post DNC Rips Mike Pence for Lying, Failing to Mention LGBTQ People in World AIDS Day Speech for Second Year in a Row appeared first on Towleroad Gay News.

Read the whole story
jaimeshade
10 days ago
reply
Atlanta, GA
Share this story
Delete

I KNOW WHY YOU'RE SAD.

6 Comments and 17 Shares

On paper, Tuesday was a good day for Democrats. They took the House for the first time in eight years. Several important Governorships (in advance of post-Census 2020 redistricting battles) were won. Notably vile Republicans like Kris Kobach, Scott Walker, and Dana Rohrabacher lost. The high-visibility Senate races Democrats lost (Missouri, Tennessee) were pipe dreams anyway. You already knew that Florida sucks, hard. So you're not sad because "The Democrats did badly."

You're also not sad because Beto lost, or Andrew Gillum lost, or any other single candidate who got people excited this year fell short. They're gonna be fine. They will be back. You haven't seen the last of any of them. Winning a Senate race in Texas was never more than a long shot. Gillum had a realistic chance, but once again: It's Florida.

No, you're sad for the same reason you were so sad Wednesday morning after the 2016 Election. You're sad because the results confirm that half of the electorate – a group that includes family, neighbors, friends, random fellow citizens – looked at the last two years and declared this is pretty much what they want. You're sad because any Republican getting more than 1 vote in this election, let alone a majority of votes, forces us to recognize that a lot of this country is A-OK with undisguised white supremacy. You're sad because once again you have been slapped across the face with the reality that a lot of Americans are, at their core, a lost cause. Willfully ignorant. Unpersuadable. Terrible people. Assholes, even.

You were hoping that the whole country would somehow restore your faith in humanity and basic common decency by making a bold statement, trashing Republicans everywhere and across the board. You wanted some indication that if you campaigned hard enough, rednecks and white collar bloodless types alike could be made to see the light that perhaps the levers of power are not best entrusted to the absolute worst people that can be dredged up from Internet comment sections running on platforms of xenophobia, nihilism, and racism. In short, you wanted to see some evidence that corruption, venality, bigotry, and proud ignorance are deal-breakers for the vast majority of Americans.

And now you're sad because it's obvious that they aren't. Even where horrible Republicans like Walker or Kobach lost, they didn't lose by much.

So I get it. It's depressing. There's no amount of positives that can take away the nagging feeling that lots and lots of people in this country are just…garbage. They're garbage human beings just like the president they adore. These people are not one conversation, one fact-check, and one charismatic young Democratic candidate away from seeing the light. They're reactionary, mean, ignorant, uninteresting in becoming less ignorant, and vindictive. They hate you and they will vote for monsters to prove it.

Remember this feeling. Remember it every time someone tells you that the key to moving forward is to reach across the aisle, show the fine art of decorum in practice, and chat with right-wingers to find out what makes them tick. Remember the nagging sadness you feel looking at these almost entirely positive results; it will be your reminder that the only way to beat this thing is to outwork, outfight, and out-organize these people. They are not going to be won over and they will continue to prove that to you every chance they get.

Read the whole story
rocketo
36 days ago
reply
How many words fit on a sampler? I don’t want to get this as a tattoo.

“Remember this feeling. Remember it every time someone tells you that the key to moving forward is to reach across the aisle, show the fine art of decorum in practice, and chat with right-wingers to find out what makes them tick. Remember the nagging sadness you feel looking at these almost entirely positive results; it will be your reminder that the only way to beat this thing is to outwork, outfight, and out-organize these people. They are not going to be won over and they will continue to prove that to you every chance they get.”
seattle, wa
jaimeshade
36 days ago
reply
Atlanta, GA
Share this story
Delete
5 public comments
zwol
36 days ago
reply
This seems like the right place to tell the story of the dude who drove me to the airport the other day. His other job, apparently, was owning a gun store, and when talking about guns his opinions were informed and reasonable , e.g. "banning bump stocks won't stop school shootings, but we should require gun owners to go through safety training and have proper gun safes," ok, I can see that. But then the conversation took a hard right turn into Fox News conspiracy land: all politicians are corrupt, Planned Parenthood spends 10x as much money on lobbying as the NRA, etc. etc. etc. and I just didn't know what to say.
Pittsburgh, PA
tdarby
36 days ago
reply
Yes.
Baltimore, MD
lelandpaul
37 days ago
reply
Oh, this is so hard for me. On the one hand, the piece is dead right: This is exactly what I'm feeling today.

On the other: I fundamentally believe people are redeemable and that we shouldn't write them off. (That's sort of core to Christianity...)

I don't know how to reconcile these two things.
San Francisco, CA
sirshannon
36 days ago
You can’t redeem the unwilling.
lelandpaul
35 days ago
But does that give you the right to stop giving them opportunities to redeem themselves?
sirshannon
33 days ago
Yes. You’re not powerful enough to stop someone from redeeming themselves any more than you are powerful enough to make them redeem themselves. As long as you’re not actively working to prevent them from doing the right thing, you’re good.
notadoctor
37 days ago
reply
“They are not going to be won over and they will continue to prove that to you every chance they get.”
Oakland, CA
cjmcnamara
37 days ago
reply
gin and tacos absolutely spot on once again

Abrams’ Flag-Burning Incident: That’s What They Force You to Do as a Black Person in the South

1 Share

In 1992, when Stacey Abrams was in college, she participated in a protest where there was a burning of a Georgia state flag that had been redesigned in 1956 specifically to incorporate the Confederate battle flag emblem in it, in a clear attempt to make a statement against the burgeoning Civil Rights Movement. That…

Read more...

Read the whole story
jaimeshade
51 days ago
reply
Atlanta, GA
Share this story
Delete

A Seahawks Fan's Defense of Kshama Sawant

2 Shares
The Seahawks aren’t going anywhere thanks to Allen, but the powerless have been forced to relocate over and over again over the past decade within and outside of the city. by Spike Friedman
Kshama Sawant
Kshama Sawant Karen Ducey / Getty

Shortly after former Seahawks owner and Vulcan chairman Paul Allen’s death last week, Seattle City Councilmember Ksahama Sawant made the following Facebook post:


This was, to put it lightly, not received well. Sawant has drawn the ire of Seahawks fans and mainstream columnists, for both the timing and content of her post. As a Seahawks fan and, well, not-so-mainstream columnist, I wanted to weigh in with what is maybe a counterbalancing view of this comment.

First though, as a Seahawks fan, let me give Paul Allen credit. Allen’s wealth kept the Seahawks in Seattle. He hired Pete Carroll, ensured the team drafted Walter Jones, and jammed out after the team won the Super Bowl. I love the Seahawks, and it would have crushed me as a kid if they had left. Allen gave me some of my favorite memories. Allen’s wealth also funded cancer research. It led to scientific breakthroughs and the rediscovery of the treasures of the deep. His wealth funded the arts and endowed large cultural institutions in the region. That he also owned fancy yachts is a symptom of the inequity of capitalism, but is hardly a great sin. As billionaires go? Paul Allen could have been a lot worse (see: Bezos, Jeff).

That said, Allen’s wealth also reconfigured Seattle to conform to a mental map of the city that disproportionally benefitted a small subset of the region while neglecting a large portion of the area’s residents. His work with Vulcan is perhaps the most important spatial transformation that Seattle has undergone since the Denny Regrade, making Allen Seattle’s equivalent of Robert Moses. Like Moses he was unelected, and like Moses, he reshaped the area while privileging an image of the city seen from basically a bird’s eye perspective. This was true of South Lake Union when he proposed the Seattle Commons, and only more true when he developed the area into Amazon’s campus. It is not Allen’s fault per se that he was allowed to act as the de facto city planner of a wide swath of the city, but he was, and he leveraged his vast wealth to make choices that disrupted a lot of lives.

The most vulnerable populations in this city have suffered as a result of Allen’s massive interventions. The gentrification caused by the recentering of the tech industry to the spatial center of the region has led to massive waves of displacement and dispossession. The middle and lower classes of the city have effectively been shunted out of Seattle proper and into outlying areas. This spatial reconfiguration may not have been Allen’s intention in redeveloping South Lake Union, but it has been the effect of what he did. This could have been mitigated through progressive taxation. It was not in large part because of Paul Allen.

In this respect, Sawant was right: Allen funded anti-tax campaigns (including the opposition of I-1098 in direct conflict with the Gates family) that would have had a redistributive effect on the benefits reaped by those lucky enough to thrive over the past decade. She cited former Stranger writer Dominic Holden’s piece “Remember the Greediest,” which may be a relatively unfair characterization of Allen when compared to, say, Bezos, but speaks to his desire to control not only where the wealth he distributed went, but also the shape of the city he lived adjacent to.

Seattle is a profoundly and increasingly unequal city. And this inequality persists along racial, gender and class lines. Allen’s work with Vulcan inscribed these power imbalances in the spatial configuration of the center of the city. The people who lost out in the reconfiguration that created our new Seattle are angry and have every right to be angry because of systemic structures of power.

Which is to say that while essentially dancing on Paul Allen’s grave before he was lowered into it was gross, and I understand why people are mad at Sawant, I also understand why she and others are mad at Allen. Reading Sawant’s comment generously, she is attempting to give a voice to this anger, to preempt a hagiography of a man who wielded a lot of power and did so in the service of only a subset of the people affected by that power.

And to the large number of Seahawks fans out there who are really pissed at Sawant right now? I’d ask them to take a second and think of the relatively powerless to whom she’s giving voice. The Seahawks aren’t going anywhere thanks to Allen, but the powerless have been forced to relocate over and over again over the past decade within and outside of the city. I know how rough it would have been if the Seahawks had lost their home; consider sympathizing with someone giving voice to people who have lost theirs.

[ Comment on this story ]

[ Subscribe to the comments on this story ]

Read the whole story
rocketo
50 days ago
reply
seattle, wa
jaimeshade
51 days ago
reply
Atlanta, GA
Share this story
Delete

So, What's Marijuana Got to Do With It?

2 Shares

In a search affidavit that we apparently know all the contents of, we now know that the police apparently found some marijuana—about .37 ounces—in Botham Jean’s apartment after he was shot by Dallas police officer Amber Guyger.

Read more...

Read the whole story
jaimeshade
91 days ago
reply
Atlanta, GA
rocketo
91 days ago
reply
seattle, wa
Share this story
Delete

When you realize what Trump’s vast popularity means: that you don’t like Americans anymore.

2 Shares

When an anonymous Trump official says that the official Trump Doctrine is “We’re America, Bitch,” they’re representing the people

↩︎ GQ

View Post →

Read the whole story
jaimeshade
161 days ago
reply
Atlanta, GA
rocketo
162 days ago
reply
seattle, wa
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories